Voice of Liberty

Name:
Location: United States

I am a proud American. I love to spend time with my family and friends. I started this blog because I was unhappy with the way the mainstream media portrays the news and I wanted a way to let my voice be heard even to a few.

Saturday, September 30, 2006

Who is really for protecting America?

The Weekly Standard did an excellent article on how the Democrats are the ones in denial on the battle we face against terrorism. They fail to understand that victory in Iraq is vital and that diplomacy which is not backed up by action is idle threats that only embolden the enemy who can see us for the fearful cowards we are. Diplomacy without action is like the mother who tells her screaming brat to obey and begins counting her fingers again and again the kid know the game and realized they can get what they want, after all mom’s threats are harmless talk. The Iraq war was necessary, after all how long to you threaten a tyrant with do this or else unless you back it up. Otherwise the enemy laughs at our threats and is emboldened because they reason- after all their too scared to fight me equaling I won.

In the elections this year Americans will have the choice they saw what democrat denial brought during the Clinton years on September 11th, and now we have a choice will we follow the lead of President Bush and those in Congress who are willing to defend America with tough action or will they follow the cowardly hit and run strategy of the Democrats.

I enjoyed the President’s radio address on the information the intelligence agency reported highlighting the serious threat of terrorism has against us. In ABC’s “Path to 9-11” we saw what happened when we ignored the warnings of the intelligence agencies and we cannot do it again.

I thought I would post most of President Bush’s radio address, as I think it is well said.

"The National Intelligence Estimate confirms that we are up against a determined and capable enemy. The NIE lists four underlying factors that are fueling the extremist movement: first, long-standing grievances such as corruption, injustice, and a fear of Western domination; second, the jihad in Iraq; third, the slow pace of reform in Muslim nations; and fourth, pervasive anti-Americanism. It concludes that terrorists are exploiting all these factors to further their movement.

Some in Washington have selectively quoted from this document to make the case that by fighting the terrorists in Iraq, we are making our people less secure here at home. This argument buys into the enemy's propaganda that the terrorists attack us because we are provoking them. Here is what Prime Minister Tony Blair said this week about that argument: "This terrorism isn't our fault. We didn't cause it. It's not the consequence of foreign policy." Prime Minister Blair is right. We do not create terrorism by fighting terrorism. The terrorists are at war against us because they hate everything America stands for, and because they know we stand in the way of their ambitions to take over the Middle East. We are fighting to stop them from taking over Iraq and turning that country into a safe haven that would be even more valuable than the one they lost in Afghanistan.

Iraq is not the reason the terrorists are at war against us. Our troops were not in Iraq when terrorists first attacked the World Trade Center in 1993, or when terrorists blew up our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, or when they bombed the USS Cole, or when they killed nearly 3,000 people on September the 11th, 2001. Five years after the 9/11 attacks, some people in Washington still do not understand the nature of the enemy. The only way to protect our citizens at home is to go on the offense against the enemy across the world. When terrorists spend their days working to avoid capture, they are less able to plot, plan, and execute new attacks on our people. So we will remain on the offense until the terrorists are defeated and this fight is won.

In my recent speeches, I've said we are in the early hours of a long struggle for civilization, and that our safety depends on the outcome of the battle in Iraq. The National Intelligence Estimate declares "perceived jihadist success there would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere." It also says that "Should jihadists leaving Iraq perceive themselves, and be perceived, to have failed, we judge fewer fighters will be inspired to carry on the fight."

Withdrawing from Iraq before the enemy is defeated would embolden the terrorists. It would help them find new recruits to carry out even more destructive attacks on our Nation, and it would give the terrorists a new sanctuary in the heart of the Middle East, with huge oil riches to fund their ambitions. America must not allow this to happen. We are a Nation that keeps its commitments to those who long for liberty and want to live in peace. We will stand with the nearly 12 million Iraqis who voted for their freedom, and we will help them fight and defeat the terrorists there, so we do not have to face them here at home."

Sunday, September 10, 2006

ABC's Path to 9-11

Tonight I watched the first part of ABC's Path to 9-11. This film was highly criticized by the Clintons. I wondered why and was even more curious to watch it. After I watched, I thought the film did a good job portraying the enemy we are up against and their determination to defeat us and bring civilization under the bondage of their ways and the fear it brings.

The Clintons made a bad move to criticize publicizing what happened under their watch, which led to 9-11. Perhaps they would like it better had President Bush shouldered the blame for what their negligence had allowed to happen. I am glad for the film because it shows that we were in this war before 9-11, though as in World War II we did not recognize it until Pearl Harbor. Thankfully we have President Bush as our leader who recognizes the threat and is determined against all odds to defeat our enemy and protect us.

The film left a haunting impression of the hatred of our enemies and the oppressive atmosphere in which terrorism grows. A new ideology needs to grow in the Middle East, one of freedom and democracy. It is nice to see it beginning to grow in Iraq and Afghanistan.